Can you read this? (How our brain works) - Page 2

Paper_Chaser · 08-11-2008, 07:00 PM

If anyone has struggled abit, heres is a clue, i may be wrong but:

But this supposedly postrugeiis department appears incorrect. If they had created a different example, perhaps they wouldn’t be drawing these deceptive cosinuncols so quickly. They also conveniently re-ordered their letters to be easier to decipher, making an exceedingly wrslehots sample worse. The Linguistic department at Cambridge University needs steamrr rrccheeserahs.

Il let you do the rest. Peace

Beelzebubbles · 08-12-2008, 01:26 PM

Well done PC

A damn sight harder than the first example, isn't it? It all depends on the length of the words and the way in which the letters are jumbled.

Paper_Chaser · 08-12-2008, 02:15 PM

Yeah twas trickier, il be honest, it wasnt instant translation. Peace

yeastthebeast92 · 08-14-2008, 04:47 AM

Wow that last translation was hard to read! But I have seen the Cambridge University word scramble paragraph before it's gone viral and its all over the internet now.

pokerguru · 08-14-2008, 04:50 AM

lol, yeah, iread about this not long ago, our mind rearranges words and finds familiar patterns.

friera · 08-16-2008, 08:52 AM

i agree with beelze. however, i couldnt really understand what beelze wrote, i can understand a maximum of 30%.

Beelzebubbles · 08-16-2008, 09:38 AM

Completely forgot about this thread. The translation of the last bit I posted is:

But this supposedly prestigious department appears incorrect. If they had created a different example, perhaps they wouldn't be drawing false conclusions so quickly. They also conveniently reordered their letters to be easier to decipher, making an exceedingly worthless sample worse. The Linguistic Department at Cambridge University needs smarter researchers.